I’m finally reading Peter Wohlleben’s NYT
bestseller The Hidden Life of Trees.
Having a job that once again revolves around ecology, I find myself sliding
back into the field’s writings. I should have always kept an eye on it, but
Life pulled me this way and that over the years. I must humbly accept that fact
and try to understand what’s been learned in the last 25 years.
As I began reading it, I immediately saw many
similarities between Mr. Wohlleben’s observations and my own in my book, Dear Warriors. Specifically:
interdependence. Even his cover and the first image I put in my introduction
are similar. Both depict flourishing trees in modified cross-section. Whereas
his focuses on 3 trees and their roots, I drew a single tree, its roots, and
the elements it’s exposed to.
Initially, I experienced an embarrassed flush of
nervousness. I worried that my book’s art and ideas would be construed as a
copy, even though I hadn’t read Mr. Wohlleben’s work before publishing. I could
have easily slipped into a mental canyon of inadequacy, telling myself that my
work was yet another example of my lack of originality and hidden it. Instead,
I’m choosing to wave it as another support for the veracity of this notion that
life is all about interdependence.
My whole point in pulling trees into my
analysis of living with type 1 diabetes was to draw an analogy between trees
and people. I felt a connection. Mr. Wohlleben’s book focuses solely on the
gorgeous details of what trees go through, emphasizing specific ways they
relate to both others of their own kind and entirely different species. I would
suggest reading his book first, then mine. If you can learn to believe that
trees aren’t independent and self-contained, then you can be open to the notion
that no human is, either. You can also learn to believe that our daily
activities can reflect that we’re stronger together, as I tried to state in Dear Warriors.
We’re stronger together, whether we’re talking humans or trees.
I titled this essay Humility. Humility
and being humble are vital to our best lives, in my opinion. With them as our
foundation, the ego can’t take over. We cannot become engrossed by the “wonder”
of our own ways and thoughts and act as though other humans are enemies.
The science behind Peter Wohlleben’s work
shores up his claims about trees- ideas that many might find fantastical and
easily discounted if they were not being tested and corroborated by
others around the globe. If we’re open to seeing deeper truths. To me,
they prove one thing: we cannot believe we know everything about this world we
live in. We have to be open to “if”.
We must humbly admit that we are not omniscient.
The networks that trees appear to thrive best
in reminds me of other networks being uncovering and studied in recent years.
For instance, take the human microbiome. Nature.com has a great timeline review and
specific deep-dive information on this expanding field of study. Over half the
cells in and on our bodies are not human. They all can affect how we live and
perhaps we can adjust our living to maximize our relationships with these other
entities to improve how we feel and how well we live. Can we humbly admit that
we need some of these other species and encourage them? Can we accept that they
may need us and we might do best by allowing them to coexist with us?
Can we accept with humility that we need other humans and other species to survive and thrive?
It can be an uncomfortable shift in thought.
But, it can also be comforting because we’re capable of seeing truths and
falsehoods. We’re capable of testing to confirm. We’re capable of failing and
trying again. We can move forward, even if the steps are painful.
I’m looking at trees a bit differently of
late. I knew I thought of them in some sort of kinship, but Peter Wohlleben has
given me some substance to firm up those feelings. If their bodies are linked
to many others and if our bodies are linked to many others, then how far does this
linkage idea go? It fills me with hope, wonder, and a sense of place.
Neither a tree’s life nor a human’s is
idyllic. Both eventually come to an end. But I can pat a tree’s bark and
consider its journey, as I can my own, with humility and kinship and smile.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.